Expertise
-
Practice Areas:
- Bar Admissions:
- Education:
- Osgoode Hall Law School (2015) JD
- McGill University (2010) MA (Religious Studies)
- McGill University (2008) BA (Religious Studies)
Details
- Bio
- Cases
- Associations
- Blog Posts
- News & Media
- Publications & Presentations
- Recognition
Madison Robins (she/her)
is a partner at Lenczner Slaght.
"Madison's ability to synthesise complex problems and get to the heart of a matter in a short period of time is exceptional." — Chambers Canada
Madison’s practice focuses on high-stakes securities and shareholder litigation, complex contract disputes, and professional liability matters. Madison has a track record of success in hearings before judges, juries, arbitrators, and regulators, including as lead counsel. She has appeared before all levels of court, including the Supreme Court of Canada.
Madison represents public and private companies, financial institutions, founders, and professionals. She delivers sound judgment and decisive results to advance her client’s strategic objectives both in and out of court. Her clients value her ability to distill complex issues into clear, persuasive narratives and trust her to protect their businesses and reputation in contentious disputes.
Madison has particular expertise in arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, having successfully completed the Toronto Commercial Arbitration Society’s Gold Standard Course.
Madison received her JD from Osgoode Hall where she graduated with course prizes in contracts, administrative law, and private international law.
Prior to attending law school, Madison studied ancient religions at McGill University and the University of Toronto.
-
Counsel to the successful mortgage lender in a motion to lift an interim stay of enforcement obtained by the borrowers. As well, in a series of court decisions confirming the validity of the mortgage agreements and the enforceability of a significant commercial mortgage subject to a forbearance agreement.
-
Counsel to Carillion Canada Inc. in a motion against its former bank seeking the return of funds debited from the company bank account as set-off during the CCAA stay period. The bank was found to have knowingly breached the stay order, resulting in a significant costs award.
-
Counsel to a former director and officer in an Ontario Securities Commission enforcement proceeding.
-
Counsel to the defendant emergency physician in an action relating to the transfer of the plaintiff from a community hospital to a tertiary centre.
-
In the Matter of Nicholas Agar and Paul Ungerman
Counsel to the co-founder of a cryptocurrency and blockchain project that was the subject of an investigation by a Canadian securities regulator in relation to concerns that have been raised about the status of the cryptocurrency as a security, prospectus exemption requirements and representations that were made to those who have purchased the cryptocurrency.
-
The Foundation Assisting Canadian Talent on Recordings v The Bank of Nova Scotia
Counsel to Scotiabank in an application before the Commercial List arising from a multi-million dollar cyber-fraud that involves complex cyber-security evidence and raises significant and potentially far-reaching legal issues regarding the scope of customers' and financial institutions' obligations to prevent cyber-fraud.
-
Counsel to two defendants in a cross-border claim brought by a former employee and business partner alleging forgery and fraud with respect to a share transfer.
-
Mohamad Fakih et al v AHM Investments Corporation et al
Counsel to Mohamad Fakih, Founder and CEO of Paramount Fine Foods, in a complex shareholder dispute.
-
Counsel to the co-founder and managing principal of a real estate investment company facing separate oppression claims from his brother/co-founder and an important investment partner.
-
Robert Plamondon v Knowledge First Financial Inc
Counsel to Knowledge First Financial, a leading investment fund and RESP provider, in an action brought by a former agency director for commissions and referral fees he alleges are owed. The matter involves the tolling of limitation periods, the duty of good faith in contractual negotiations, and unjust enrichment in the context of securities commissions.
-
Canadian Bar Association
-
Ontario Bar Association - Member-at-Large, Alternative Dispute Resolution Executive (2021-2022)
-
The Advocates' Society - Member-at-Large, Arbitration & Mediation Advocacy Practice Group (2026-2027)
-
Young Commercial Arbitration Practitioners
-
Ontario Securities Commission - Securities Proceedings Advisory Committee (2026-2029)
-
Best Practices For Preparing Written Materials on the Commercial List
The blog, Best Practices for Preparing Written Materials on the Commercial List, authored by Madison Robins and Julien Sicco, was published on commerciallist.com. In the blog, they explain why form can be just as important as substance, and outline best practices for uploading to Case Center, filing factums, building compendiums of key documents and excerpts, preparing Aide Memoires, and blacklining draft orders against the Court's model orders.
-
Winning Isn’t Everything: What To Expect From Costs Awards on the Commercial List
Madison Robins’s blog, Winning Isn’t Everything: What To Expect From Costs Awards On The Commercial List, was published on commerciallist.com. In this blog, Madison breaks down what parties can expect from costs awards on the Commercial List and why proportionality, settlement offers, and efficient staffing drive outcomes.
-
The Working Group established by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Ministry of the Attorney General has proposed significant reforms to the Rules of Civil Procedure in the Civil Rules Review Final Policy Report. The proposed changes are aimed at creating a more efficient and accessible civil justice system. Our overview of the proposed changes and key differences from the existing Rules can be found here.
-
Dramatic changes have been proposed for Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure. Now that the final recommendations from the Civil Rules Review Working Group have been released, in-house counsel teams should be thinking about steps that may be needed to ensure their business can transition seamlessly to a new litigation procedure. We have set out some considerations for in-house teams to help prepare for a smooth transition.
-
Proposed Changes to the Rules for Expert Witnesses: Cooperation, Conferencing, & Consequences
In its original Phase 2 Consultation Paper, the Civil Rules Review Working Group proposed radical changes to the way expert witnesses are treated before and during trial, including – most controversially – a call for experts to be jointly appointed and instructed by opposing parties. While some of the initial proposals have been softened following the consultation process, the Working Group’s Final Policy Report recommends three major changes to the current regime for expert witnesses:
-
An Update on the Proposed Changes to Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure
Lenczner Slaght is closely tracking Ontario’s proposed civil justice reforms. Yesterday, the Civil Rules Review Working Group’s co-chairs presented a summary of the recommendations in their yet-to-be-released Final Report to the Attorney General and Chief Justice.
In this blog, we summarize the key takeaways and new information from this significant presentation, since our last update in October (in which we outlined eight expected key features of the Rules reform proposals).
-
Madison Robins and Solomiya Zakharchuk co-authored the blog Arrivederci, for Now, published on commerciallist.com.
-
There’s nothing like a jury trial. The Honourable Justice Brian Dickson famously commented that juries were “endowed with an abundance of common sense”. The virtues of civil jury trials to our justice system may be too numerable to list here. But as a point of advocacy, the exercise of telling your client’s story to a jury of their peers – instead of to a judge sitting up on the dais – requires different skills, different sensibilities, and different presentation styles.
-
No Jordan Rules for Administrative Tribunals
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision today in Law Society of Saskatchewan v Abrametz is a significant one for all lawyers practicing before administrative tribunals. In brief, the decision confirms that the three-part Blencoe test for delay and abuse of process in administrative proceedings continues in force. To establish that a delay rises to the level of abuse of process, a party must establish...
-
The SCC Leave Project: Predictions for June 10, 2021
Here’s a look at the leave application decisions that the Supreme Court of Canada will be releasing on June 10, 2021.
-
49 Lenczner Slaght Litigators Named in Best Lawyers in Canada 2027
In the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers in Canada, 49 of our expert litigators earned 172 rankings across 26 practice areas, a testament to the depth and breadth of our advocacy.
-
7 Lenczner Slaght Litigators Elected to Leadership Positions in The Advocates’ Society
As recognized leaders of the bar, our expert litigators will play an active role in advancing the mission of The Advocates' Society, helping to shape professional development through educational programs, networking events, volunteer initiatives, mentorship opportunities, and more.
-
Lenczner Slaght Celebrates 25 Years on the Lexpert Bull’s-Eye
The 2026 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory continues to recognize Lenczner Slaght as the #1 firm in Toronto for Litigation and Commercial Litigation.
-
2025 Lexpert Rising Stars: Madison Robins & Margaret Robbins
Lenczner Slaght is proud to share that Madison Robins and Margaret Robbins were both recognized as 2025 Lexpert Rising Stars at last night’s award ceremony held at the Liberty Grand in Toronto.
-
Lenczner Slaght Recognized as Canada’s Leading Litigators
Based on an in-depth peer review process across the legal profession, 26 Lenczner Slaght lawyers are recognized in the 2025 Lexpert Special Edition: Canada’s Leading Litigation Lawyers for their exceptional advocacy and extensive courtroom experience.
-
Lenczner Slaght Litigators Featured Among Best Lawyers in Canada
The 2026 edition of Best Lawyers in Canada recognizes Lenczner Slaght with 180+ rankings, featuring 48 of our expert litigators across 27 practice areas.
-
2025 Lexpert Directory Highlights Lenczner Slaght’s Excellence in Advocacy
Peers and senior members of the legal profession across the country continue to recognize the depth and breadth of Canada’s leading litigation firm in the latest 2025 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.
-
Lenczner Slaght Litigators Recognized as the Best Lawyers in Canada
In the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers in Canada, Lenczner Slaght is proud to receive 168 total rankings, with 45 of our expert litigators recognized for their expertise across 25 practice areas.
-
Canada’s leading litigation firm is proud to announce the promotion of Meghan Bridges, Madison Robins, and Jonathan McDaniel to its partnership.
-
Friends Who Argue: Crypto Assets - Dealing With Emerging Currencies in the Litigation Context
Madison Robins is featured on an episode of Friends Who Argue, a podcast for the litigation bar brought to you by The Advocates’ Society and hosted by its Mid-Career Advocates' Standing Committee. Madison shares her experiences and insights into the what, when and how of dealing with crypto assets in litigation.
-
2025 Snapshot: Through the Lens of Lenczner Slaght
We’ve released our 2025 Snapshot, highlighting the most significant developments, decisions, and trends in litigation from the past year across 21 practice areas. Reflect on 2025 and look ahead to 2026 through the lens of our expert litigators.
-
Madison Robins authored the article, "Updating Marquard: A Proposal to Allow the Use of “Authoritative Literature” in the Cross-Examination of Experts," pulished by The Law Society of Saskatchewan's Adocates Quarterly Collection. In the article, Madison proposes expanding the trial judge’s gatekeeping role in the cross-examination of expert witnesses using authoritative literature.
-
2024 Snapshot: Through the Lens of Lenczner Slaght
Lenczner Slaght launches our 2024 Snapshot, which highlights the most significant developments, decisions, and trends in litigation from the past year across 20 areas of expertise. Reflect on 2024 and look ahead to 2025 through the lens of our expert litigators.
-
Lenczner Slaght Advocacy Competition in Legal Ethics and Professionalism 2024
We were proud to continue our sponsorship of Western Law’s Annual Advocacy Competition in Legal Ethics and Professionalism. Madison Robins, Sean Lewis, Bonnie Greenaway, Sahar Talebi, and Kyle Magee participated as judges.
-
2023 Snapshot: Through the Lens of Lenczner Slaght
Lenczner Slaght launches our 2023 Snapshot, a look at the most significant developments, decisions, business takeaways, and trends in litigation from the last year, across 15 practice areas. Revisit 2023 and look ahead to 2024 through the lens of our expert litigators.
-
Controlling Adverse and Hostile Witnesses
In this edition of The Advocates' Journal, Madison Robins shared her expert strategies for handling an adverse, inconsistent, conveniently forgetful, or downright hostile witness.
-
Accessory Liability in Canadian Law
Madison Robins authored the article Accessory Liability in Canadian Law, which was published in the Annual Review of Civil Litigation 2020.
-
Best Lawyers in Canada (2024-2026)
Ones to Watch – Administrative & Public Law, Corporate & Commercial Litigation, Health Care Law, Insolvency and Financial Restructuring Law, Medical Negligence, Securities Law
-
Best Lawyers in Canada (2027)
Administrative and Public Law
-
Canadian Legal Lexpert® Directory (2025-2026)
Litigation - Corporate Commercial, Medical Negligence, Professional Liability
-
Lexpert Rising Stars (2025)
Leading Lawyers Under 40
-
Lexpert Special Edition: Canada's Leading Health Sciences Lawyers (2026)
-
Lexpert Special Edition: Canada's Leading Insolvency and Restructuring Lawyers (2025)
-
Lexpert Special Edition: Canada's Leading Litigation Lawyers (2025)